Chihiro Muramatsu vs Harmony Tan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Muramatsu vs H. Tan

Chihiro Muramatsu
JPN
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
28
-
Height
-
580
C. Rank
238
205
Best Rank
90
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$95.2K
Career Money
$638.7K
-
Plays
-

Harmony Tan
FRA
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
28
-
Height
-
580
C. Rank
238
205
Best Rank
90
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$95.2K
Career Money
$638.7K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Muramatsu 1 - 0 Tan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Chihiro Muramatsu winning 2 and Harmony Tan winning 1. The last match between Chihiro Muramatsu and Harmony Tan was at the Prague Open - Prague, 31-08-2020, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Chihiro Muramatsu getting the victory 4-6 6-3 5-1 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Muramatsu | 1 |
| Tan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Prague Open - Prague(08-31-20)
Chihiro Muramatsu
4
6
5
Harmony Tan
6
3
1
C. Muramatsu vs H. Tan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $95,167 | Career Prize Money | $638,698 |
| 55.58% (289-231) | Career Total W/L | 55.71% (395-314) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 12 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Muramatsu vs H. Tan Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chihiro Muramatsu has won 40.17% of points on their second serve, while Harmony Tan has won 40.20%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chihiro Muramatsu, in recent form, has won 52.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Harmony Tan has won 48.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.06% and 31.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chihiro Muramatsu has saved 51.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Harmony Tan has saved 53.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chihiro Muramatsu has won 57.63% of matches played (W/L 34/25), with Harmony Tan winning 65.06% (W/L 54/29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chihiro Muramatsu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 219/159), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/6). Harmony Tan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 19/11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 130/128).
- Player level: In the last year, Chihiro Muramatsu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.49% of matches (W/L 31/22), where as Harmony Tan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.50% of matches (W/L 54/26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chihiro Muramatsu winning 1 times and Harmony Tan being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chihiro Muramatsu winning 2 and Harmony Tan winning 1.
- The last match between Chihiro Muramatsu and Harmony Tan was at the Prague Open - Prague, 31-08-2020, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Chihiro Muramatsu getting the victory 4-6 6-3 5-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:36:29.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chihiro Muramatsu has played against opponents with an average rank of 204.03 while Harmony Tan has played against players with an average rank of 361.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chihiro Muramatsu has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Harmony Tan has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chihiro Muramatsu has converted 47.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Harmony Tan has converted 40.60% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Chihiro Muramatsu vs Harmony Tan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Muramatsu vs H. Tan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:36:29 | Average Match Time | 2:36:29 |
| 73% (72/98) | 1st Serve % | 51% (45/89) |
| 53% (38/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (25/45) |
| 46% (12/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (15/44) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (6/20) |
| 55% (49/89) | Return Points Win % | 49% (48/98) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Muramatsu 46%, Tan 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Muramatsu 59%, Tan 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Muramatsu 54%, Tan 57%.
C. Muramatsu Recent Matches Played
H. Tan Recent Matches Played

C. Muramatsu vs H. Tan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.58% (289/231) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.71% (395/314) |
| 54.82% (648/534) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.58% (881/704) |
| 52.10% (5534/5088) | Games Win/Loss | 52.73% (7367/6605) |
| 57.94% (219/159) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.47% (131/101) |
| 46.67% (42/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.39% (130/128) |
| 53.85% (21/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.85% (115/74) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 63.33% (19/11) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 132 | Aces Total | 1124 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 814 | Total Double Faults | 1233 |
| 1:38:20 | Average Match Time | 1:13:46 |
| 284.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 492.66 |
| 72% (21070/29183) | 1st Serve % | 58% (21337/36831) |
| 57% (11905/21070) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (13410/21337) |
| 46% (3724/8112) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (7083/15494) |
| 48% (1900/3973) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2285/4586) |
| 47% (13993/29855) | Return Points Win % | 46% (16631/35786) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 38.89% (14/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 37.50% (6/10) | Main Tour W/L | 42.62% (26/35) |
| 55.30% (240/194) | Challenger W/L | 56.17% (255/199) |
| 65.08% (41/22) | Futures W/L | 64.86% (96/52) |
| 55% (283/514) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (388/683) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 10% (1/10) |
| 53% (45/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (63/120) |
| 49% (69/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (86/175) |
| 87% (279/244) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (399/345) |
| 13% (279/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (399/52) |
| 19% (241/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (309/49) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:30 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
1.37
W2
2.8
10:30 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
1.091
W2
5.85
10:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.14
W2
6.15
01:05 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
2.64
W2
1.41
07:00 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
1.61
W2
2.15
07:00 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
2.72
W2
1.39
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Tristan Schoolkate vs Matej Dodig Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Lyon Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mikhail Kukushkin vs Billy Harris Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Betting Tips & Picks November 12, 2025
10 Nov 2025
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
10 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 10th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal